Am we truly the only one here who sees a strange convergence between neo-Puritanism and Old Testament ethical codes?
1. All guys are rapists and all sorts of sex (involving a male) is rape.
2. Then the man who lay with her shall give to the father of the young woman fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife, because he has violated her if an unmarried woman was raped under OT law, the rapist had to pay her father and marry her: “If a man meets a virgin who is not betrothed, and seizes her and lies with her, and they are found. He may perhaps not divorce her all his times. ” (Deut. 22:28-29)
There’s another passage in Exodus that offers the daddy the selection: “If a person seduces a virgin5 that is maybe not betrothed and lies for her and make her his wife with her, he shall give the bride-price6. If her father utterly does not want to provide her to him, he shall spend cash add up to the bride-price for virgins. ”
So that the concept is the fact that if a guy has intercourse with a female, he produces an implied contract of wedding if she desires it. This agreement would additionally stipulate his “marriageabilty” – that there is no impediment. Otherwise, he is able to be required to pay a penalty.
(BTW, i recall whenever I aisle was assigned to my Navy base in Idaho when you look at the mid-70s, among the first things they told us would be to never ever claim to others that individuals were hitched to your for the local ladies we dated, for the reason that it would develop a common-law marriage contract. )
It is often my experience that (for whatever reason) ladies who would be the many insanely promiscuous are those who would like to understand that you might be probably the most that is marriagable in order not to ever trip their anti-slut defence process. For the reason that line We remember reading of a case that is israeli a Jewish woman ended up being keen to possess intercourse having a handsome guy that she had simply met but would have to be guaranteed that her pick-up was additionally Jewish. Obviously, he stated he had been. He wasn’t; he had been Arab (we can’t let them know apart either) and also this ended up being enough for him become convicted of Rape. We confess to using done the same. Trust in me in cases where a lady that is young to sleep me personally first demanded my assent into the idea that the moon ended up being manufactured from cream cheese I would personally concur and most likely add it was additionally particularly runny.
We have to keep in mind that it was possible for a woman to receive damages by way of compensation should her fiancee terminate the engagement – the unspoken rationale of course being that by that time he had sampled the goods as it were and had thought better of it that it was not so long ago. It reminds me of an account that my dad utilized to inform me personally of an acquaintance of their who was simply therefore sued for breach of promise. The presiding Judge had granted to your ex-fiance by means of payment a large amount such that my dad commiserating along with his friend regarding the measurements of the prize received the reaction ‘it had been low priced during the price’ – which is the reason why prostitutes constantly insist upon re re payment up-front.
Professor Irina (who lives in nyc) is just a specialist that is self-professed Intellectual Property Law ( just exactly what, whenever I had been young, we modestly called Passing-Off – in those days regarded as one of many less important Torts certainly the scene then was that ultimately there is just one Tort – Negligence. That, because it ended up had been about as spectacularly a prediction that is wrong could possibly be! ). We wonder what exactly is therefore appealing to the woman Professor about Intellectual Property – no the type of thing girls frequently go set for. We additionally wonder whether she had a merchant account at Tinder. I do believe you should be told.